Mr. Stevens, an 83-year-old Republican, and Mr. Inouye, an 82-year-old Democrat, routinely deliver to their states more money per capita in earmarks — the pet projects lawmakers insert into major spending bills — than any other state gets. This year, Alaska received $1.05 billion in earmarks, or $1,677.27 per resident, while Hawaii got $903.9 million, or $746.05 per resident, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan group that tracks such figures.
Representative Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader, and many Democratic candidates have railed for months against wasteful “special interest earmarks” inserted into bills “in the dark of night.” Now their party’s electoral victories mean that Mr. Stevens will hand Mr. Inouye the gavel of the Senate defense appropriations subcommittee, which presides over the largest pool of discretionary spending and earmarks. But if the Democratic leaders are talking about “earmark reform,” that may be news to Mr. Inouye.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/washington/26earmarks.html?th&emc=th
**BIG BAZOO's take: At least Nancy Pelosi is consistent.....Say you're for ethics, then nominate the most ethically challenged to chair committees...or..in this case..say you're for cutting pork-barrel spending, then turn around and elevate the biggest pork pig to chair the Appropriations Committee!!
***HYPOCRISY ALERT***
democratic pelosi congress senator
No comments:
Post a Comment